From my session at IH Barcelona's ELT Conference yesterday…
— Tom Walton (@Tom_IHBCN) January 14, 2014
As you'll see if you follow through on the link to National Geographic, it's not the dirty coffee cup fungus I thought it was!
What was the point of the activity?
The preparation time was virtually none as I'd spotted the photo during my self-imposed maximum of 2 minutes a day on Twitter (though you might want four or five similarly "strange" pictures if you wanted to practise, for example, the language of speculation).
And for our two-seconds viewing in class, we're going to get two, three… minutes of talking, of interaction, of use of language. If for 2 seconds of "technology" we're getting 120 or 180 or more seconds of language, then that's a proportion that is starting to feel right.
Use great sources for your images
One of the things I suggested in my session was that not using Google Images and instead using better sources of images is likely to lead you to better pictures for use in class; that in turn will lead to more language — because people will find more to say about them.
— Tom Walton (@Tom_IHBCN) February 5, 2014
You could do a similar thing with the photo there: show it for 2 seconds, and ask those questions (the questions being there to kick-start the ideas — and the language); and, if you then get your learners to collaborate on writing a single story between two or three people, from your one photo, you are getting hours of language.
No interactive whiteboard?
If you have a projector in your classroom, but no interactive whiteboard, that's not a problem. You have a "blank" button on your remote that turns the projector off and on instantly? That's possibly the most useful, most powerful, of all the billions of buttons and keys at your disposal. Turn the technology off!
- The other IWB idea suggested in the session
- More ideas for using an interactive whiteboard
- Digital storytelling: creative writing with technology
*Sorry, that's the Mr Grumpy in me slipping out again !